As a long-time Samsung enthusiast and a proud user of the Galaxy S25 Ultra, I was buzzing with excitement when I heard about the Galaxy S25 Edge first time. Samsung’s promise of an ultra-slim flagship with cutting-edge tech felt like a bold move to shake up the smartphone market. But after watching the launch event and getting a quick hands-on with the device, my enthusiasm fizzled out. The S25 Edge, despite its sleek design, feels like a misstep—overpriced, overhyped, and poorly promoted. Here’s why this phone misses the “recommendation”.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is the latest addition to the S25 lineup, which includes the base S25, S25+, and S25 Ultra. Launched in May 2025, it’s marketed as a premium, ultra-slim flagship with a 5.8mm titanium frame, a 6.7-inch QHD+ AMOLED display, and a 200MP main camera. It’s powered by the same Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset as its siblings but without some features, like a telephoto lens and a larger battery. Priced around $1,099, it sits between the S25+ ($999) and the S25 Ultra ($1,299), aiming to carve out a niche for users who want a big screen in a featherlight package.

Samsung positions the S25 Edge as a direct competitor to Apple’s rumored iPhone 17 Air and Google’s Pixel 9 Pro, emphasizing its thinness and premium build. But while it’s undeniably sleek, the compromises it makes leave it struggling to stand out in a crowded market.

Questionable Promotional Strategy:

Samsung’s marketing for the S25 Edge has been a letdown, leaning heavily on its slim design while glossing over its shortcomings. The campaign revolves around buzzwords like “revolutionary thinness” and “premium elegance,” with glossy ads showing the phone slipping effortlessly into pockets. But the messaging feels empty. Samsung wants us to believe the S25 Edge is an essential upgrade, yet it fails to explain why we need a thinner phone at the cost of key features.

Compare this to Samsung’s past campaigns, like the S21 series, which highlighted bold colors, versatile cameras, and 5G connectivity to appeal to a wide audience. Or the S24 Ultra’s launch, which leaned into Galaxy AI features like real-time translation and photo editing, giving users tangible reasons to upgrade. Then, there is S25 Edge’s ads, by contrast, feel like they are selling a concept—thinness—rather than a phone. There’s little focus on how the slim design improves daily use or why it’s worth the premium price. Social media discussion reflects this disconnection with users and questions the phone’s value.

Samsung also missed a chance to target specific audiences, like mobile gamers or content creators, who might appreciate the lightweight design. Instead, the broad “everyone needs this” approach feels forced, especially when the S25 Ultra offers more for just $200 extra (well, you can get the Ultra for less than the S25 Edge if you go for a better deal).

Overpriced:

At $1,099, the Galaxy S25 Edge is a tough sell. Let’s break it down. The S25+ costs $999 and offers a near-identical 6.7-inch AMOLED display, the same Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, a larger 4,900mAh battery, and a telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. The S25 Ultra, at $1,299, throws in a 50MP ultrawide camera, dual telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), a 6.9-inch display, and an S Pen. Meanwhile, the S25 Edge skimps on the telephoto lens, has a measly 3,900mAh battery, and uses a 12MP ultrawide camera that’s outclassed by the Ultra’s 50MP sensor.

Compared to competitors, the S25 Edge looks even less appealing. The Google Pixel 9 Pro, priced at $999, offers a 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED display, a 50MP main camera, a 48MP ultrawide, and a 48MP telephoto with 5x zoom, plus a 4,700mAh battery. The iPhone 16 Pro, at $999, boasts a 6.3-inch display, a 48MP main camera, a 48MP ultrawide, and a 5x telephoto, with a battery that lasts longer than the Edge’s. Both competitors deliver more (technically) robust camera systems and better battery life for less money.

The “premium tag” for the Edge’s slim design and titanium frame doesn’t justify the price. The new Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 are nice, but the S25+ uses similar materials for $100 less. The HOP 3.0 display tech, which allows finer refresh rate adjustments, is a minor upgrade over the S25+’s LTPO panel. For $1,099, you’re paying for aesthetics, not performance. As an S25 Ultra user, I’d rather spend the extra $200 (without the offer and discount) for a phone that doesn’t compromise on cameras or battery life.

Do we really need the Galaxy S25 Edge?

Samsung wants us to believe the S25 Edge is a must-have, but it’s hard to see why. The slim design is the star of the show, but does it solve a real problem? Most users don’t complain about their phones being too thick—the S25+ is 7.3mm and feels perfectly fine. The Edge’s 5.8mm profile is impressive, but it comes at the cost of a 3,900mAh battery that’s worryingly small for a 6.7-inch display. Early tests suggest it struggles to last a full day of heavy use, especially with power-hungry apps like games or video editors.

The 200MP main camera is a highlight, borrowed from the S25 Ultra, but the lack of a telephoto lens is a dealbreaker for anyone who loves zooming in for photos or videos. The 12MP ultrawide is still usable but lags behind the 50MP ultrawide on the Ultra and the 48MP ultrawides on the Pixel 9 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro. Features like Galaxy AI’s “Now Brief” and “AI Select” are neat but available across the S25 lineup, so these are not exclusive to the Edge.

The slim design might appeal to users who prioritize portability, like those who keep their phone in tight pockets or prefer a lightweight device for one-handed use. But for most people, the standard S25 or S25+ offers the same performance and better battery life without sacrificing camera versatility and a heavy price. The Edge feels like a niche experiment rather than a necessary addition to the lineup.

What users are saying:

The online reaction to the S25 Edge has been lukewarm at best, with many users echoing my disappointment. Here’s a sampling of opinions from early adopters and average consumers:

My Opinion:

As a Galaxy S25 Ultra user, I am spoiled by its robust hardware, and the S25 Edge feels like a downgrade in every way that matters. The 3,900mAh battery is a major concern. Running resource-intensive apps like Adobe Lightroom or Call of Duty Mobile on my Ultra is smooth, with its 5,000mAh battery lasting through hours of editing or gaming. The Edge, with its smaller battery and thinner vapor chamber for cooling, struggles to keep up. Early reviews note thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, which is a red flag for power users.

The lack of a telephoto lens is another head-scratcher. My Ultra has 3x and 5x telephoto lenses; the Edge relies on pixel binning for up to 10x zoom, but it can’t match the clarity of optical zoom. For a phone priced so close to the Ultra, this feels like a cheap shortcut. The 12MP ultrawide camera sounds downgraded in comparison to the Ultra’s 50MP sensor, especially in low light.

The slim design is undeniably cool, but it’s a gimmick that doesn’t justify the trade-offs. My S25 Ultra feels premium and delivers on every front—cameras, battery, performance. The Edge sacrifices too much to chase a trend that Apple might perfect with the iPhone 17 Air.

Hey Sammy Fans, what do you think of the Galaxy S25 Edge? Love the ultra-thin design, or are the battery and missing telephoto a dealbreaker? Share your thoughts by DM on my X handle @SamsungSWUpdate.

Samsung is well known for regularly updating and improving its software, and Galaxy Watch users have been looking forward to what’s coming next. This year, instead of launching One UI 7 Watch, Samsung is planning to release One UI 8 Watch. It’s supposed to be a major update with new features and a fresh design, but early signs of One UI 8 Watch show something that’s honestly disappointing.

Early test builds of One UI 8 Watch show a new charging animation. The problem is that it looks almost exactly like the One UI 7 design on Samsung smartphones. That animation looks good on phones with big screens, but on the small, round Galaxy Watch, it looks strange and doesn’t fit well.

Image via AndroidAuthority

Aside from the animation, Samsung will reportedly add a new App Shortcuts system, where users can choose between two shortcut tile sizes: 2×1 and 2×2. While this sounds like a helpful feature, it looks too crowded on a small screen. It feels like Samsung just copied the phone layout without thinking about how different a watch really is.

Source – Android Authority

It feels like Samsung is focusing on making the watch UI match the phone UI. While having a consistent design across devices sounds good, watches need a unique layout that fits their shape, size, and how we use them.

Honestly, these redesigned tiles and new charging animation are quite disappointing. Smartwatches are supposed to be quick, simple, and easy to use. The current direction of One UI 8 Watch feels like a change just for the sake, not something that actually helps users.

We know this is still an early version, and Samsung may improve things before the final release. But right now, it’s not looking great.

What do you think? Should Samsung redesign the One UI 8 Watch to better fit the watch screen, or are you okay with the early look? Let us know your thoughts on our social media platforms.

One UI 8 Watch to feature One UI 7-inspired charging animation

Samsung’s One UI has transformed how Galaxy users interact with their devices. The custom version of the Android interface offers a clean, intuitive experience that makes Samsung phones and tablets both personal and powerful. With One UI 8 coming alongside Android 16 in 2025, Samsung has a real opportunity to elevate its software experience even further.

However, there’s a potential issue: Samsung typically limits its beta programs to just a few countries, as we saw with the One UI 7 beta earlier this year. This approach leaves millions of users worldwide unable to participate in shaping the software they use daily.

Here’s why Samsung should go global with the One UI 8 Beta program:

A global beta program would provide Samsung with invaluable feedback from users across different regions, languages, and usage patterns. While users in the US might focus on certain features, users in other regions might identify completely different issues or opportunities for improvement.

Let’s go more in-depth, US users might prioritize features that work well with US-based services like Google Pay or specific carrier integrations, but these features might function differently or be less relevant (take this as an example) in other markets. Without global testing, these regional differences could lead to frustrating bugs or missed optimization opportunities.

When One UI 7 beta launched in select markets, including the US, in December 2024, social media and the Samsung Members community were filled with excited users sharing new findings and tips, while users in excluded countries could only watch from the sidelines.

By including everyone, Samsung would strengthen its community while demonstrating that it values user input regardless of location. This approach aligns with American values of inclusivity and would position Samsung as a truly global brand that listens to all its customers.

With Apple offering iOS developer betas worldwide, Samsung is falling behind by restricting access to its One UI beta program. A global beta program would reinforce Samsung’s image as an innovative leader rather than a follower.

A global beta program isn’t without challenges. Samsung would need to:

– Improve customer support across time zones
– Manage feedback in multiple languages
– Address region-specific bugs and compatibility issues
– Importantly, confirmation through official channels.

However, Samsung already has the resources to handle these challenges through its existing global operations and the Samsung Members app. The company successfully took its Good Lock customization tool global via the Google Play Store earlier this year, showing it can manage worldwide software releases effectively.

A global One UI 8 beta would mean:

– Earlier access to cutting-edge features
– A voice in shaping the software experience
– Being part of a worldwide community of testers and enthusiasts
– Potentially faster official updates, as more bugs would be caught during testing

Opening the One UI 8 Beta program globally isn’t just fair—it’s a smart business move. Samsung Galaxy users would benefit from software that’s been tested across diverse environments, resulting in a more stable and feature-rich experience when the official release arrives.

As Samsung prepares for the One UI 8 launch alongside new devices like the Galaxy Z Fold7 and Flip7 series, going global with the beta would demonstrate confidence in its software and commitment to the entire user base. It’s time for Samsung to make this move and give every Galaxy user a chance to help shape the future of One UI.

What do you think about the global One UI 8 Beta program? Drop your opinion or any hot tips on X (@SamsungSWUpdate).

Samsung‘s new foldable phone, the Galaxy Z Flip 7, has reportedly passed several company’s internal tests. Notably, the smartphone used the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, not Samsung’s own Exynos 2500 processor.

Earlier rumors said the Galaxy Z Flip 7 would launch with the new Exynos 2500 chip. This is Samsung’s next-generation chip that the company has been working on.

However, a reliable leaker PandaFlashPro has shared on social media that the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip is now more likely to be used in the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7. This chip is also used in Samsung’s latest flagship phones, including the Galaxy S25, Galaxy S25 Plus, and Galaxy S25 Ultra smartphones.

It shows that the Snapdragon 8 Elite version of the phone has already passed all Samsung’s internal tests for the Galaxy Z Flip 7, including important ones like network and connectivity tests. This could mean the Exynos 2500 is not quite ready for launch or may still have some issues that need fixing.

The Galaxy Z Flip 7 is expected to bring some amazing upgrades compared to the older model. These may include a larger outer display, a powerful chip, and other performance improvements. Samsung is also rumored to be working on a more affordable version of the phone called the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE.

With mass production expected to start soon, it’s still unclear if Samsung will use the Exynos 2500 at all in this model. For now, it looks like the Snapdragon 8 Elite will power the main version of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 when it launches later this year.

Report: Samsung begins OLED production for Galaxy Z Flip 7, Fold 7; Tri-Fold, Flip FE in pipeline

Samsung’s One UI 7 update was supposed to be a game-changer, promising a refined user experience, enhanced customization, and better performance for Galaxy users. Yet, here we are, staring at a halted rollout and a deafening silence from Samsung about what’s next.

As a loyal Galaxy user, I can’t help but feel frustrated and let down. More importantly, what was Samsung doing during the four long months of beta testing that started late to begin with? Let’s unpack this mess and explore why Samsung’s handling of One UI 7 feels like a betrayal to its customers.

A beta testing process: A big disappointment

Samsung kicked off the One UI 7 beta program later than expected, leaving users eagerly waiting for a glimpse of the new software. While competitors like Apple and Google typically start their beta cycles earlier, Samsung’s delay already set a shaky tone. When the beta finally started, it was meant to be an early test to find and fix problems, making sure the stable version was smooth. Four months is a long time—enough to catch and solve issues, isn’t it? Guess not.

The beta program dragged on with multiple rounds of updates that seemed to address minor tweaks rather than major concerns. Users reported persistent bugs, performance hiccups, and compatibility issues across devices, yet Samsung pushed forward with a stable rollout on April 7, 2025.

If the beta testing was thorough, how did critical issues slip through the cracks, forcing a halt just days into the stable release? It’s hard to believe that four months of testing didn’t uncover problems significant enough to pause a global rollout. This suggests either a rushed process or a lack of focus on user feedback—both of which are unacceptable for a company of Samsung’s stature.

What’s the result? One UI 7 rollout halted.

The One UI 7 stable rollout started with a lot of hype, but it fizzled out fast. Just days in, Samsung stopped it quietly. If it’s not a big deal, why halt everything? And why won’t Samsung tell us what’s wrong or when it’ll be fixed? This secrecy is super annoying. Galaxy fans, who spent big money on their phones, deserve more than silence.

As of April 14, 2025, we still don’t know when—or even if—One UI 7 will come back. This waiting game feels like a punch to loyal customers who’ve been patient for months. Samsung’s not talking, and it makes us wonder if they care about us at all. A simple “here’s the issue, and we’ll fix it by this date” would help so much. Instead, we’re stuck checking forums and social media for tiny bits of news, and that’s no way to treat fans.

What happened during the 4 months of beta testing?

Let’s talk about those four months of beta testing. Samsung had sufficient time to refine One UI 7, yet the halted rollout suggests they didn’t make the most of it. Beta testers, who dedicate time and effort to report bugs and suggest improvements, deserve to have their voices heard. But the current situation makes it feel like their feedback was ignored or mishandled.

If critical issues persisted into the stable release, what was the point of the beta program? It’s starting to look like a box-checking exercise rather than a genuine effort to deliver a polished product.

Samsung’s competitors manage to roll out updates with fewer hiccups, often within tighter timelines. Apple’s iOS betas, for example, typically last a few months, with clear communication about progress and release dates. Google’s Android betas follow a similar pattern. Samsung, however, seems to be hitting the target in the dark, leaving users questioning whether the company prioritizes quality control or is simply coasting on its reputation.

Does Samsung still have customer support?

Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of this saga is Samsung’s lack of support for its customers. When a rollout is halted, users expect prompt updates, clear communication, and a commitment to fixing things quickly. Samsung has delivered none of these. The absence of an official statement shows a disconnection between the company and its loyal users. Galaxy owners aren’t just customers; they’re advocates who’ve chosen Samsung over countless alternatives. Treating them like an afterthought is a dangerous misstep.

Support doesn’t just mean pushing out updates; it means standing by your product and your promises. Samsung’s silence erodes trust, making users wonder if future updates will follow the same chaotic pattern.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

What’s Next?

With no confirmation about One UI 7’s release date, the frustration is real. Samsung’s late start to beta testing, prolonged four-month testing period, and abrupt halt to the stable rollout paint a picture of mismanagement. The company’s refusal to engage with its customers only deepens the disappointment. If the issue is serious, why not accept it and come up with a plan?

Samsung needs to step up—fast. A detailed explanation, a revised timeline, and a commitment to transparency would be a good start. Until then, Galaxy users are left hanging, wondering whether their trust in the brand was misplaced. One UI 7 could still be a stellar update, but right now, it’s a symbol of Samsung’s failure to deliver. Here’s hoping they turn things around, but for now, the ball’s in Samsung’s court, and they’re not even swinging.

What do you think about this ongoing situation? Let me know on my X handle (@SamsungSWUpdate).